4.5 Review

Multispecies justice: Climate-just futures with, for and beyond humans

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.699

关键词

climate crisis; climate justice; cosmopolitics; multispecies justice; responsibility

资金

  1. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
  2. Sydney Environment Institute at the University of Sydney

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2019, the debate on climate emergency has intensified, leading to the recognition that current concepts of climate justice are inadequate to address the crisis. Advocating for multispecies justice, which decenters the human perspective and emphasizes the interconnectedness of individuals and societies with other beings, offers a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to confronting the complexities of climate crisis. This broader lens provides a roadmap for navigating scientific, practical, and ethical challenges in the climate crisis, while also envisioning alternative and just futures.
In 2019, the climate emergency entered mainstream debates. The normative frame of climate justice as conceived in academia, policy arenas, and grassroots action, although imperative and growing in popularity across climate movements, is no longer adequate to address this emergency. This is for two reasons: first, as a framing for the problem, current notions of climate justice are insufficient to overcome the persistent silencing of voices belonging to multiple others; and second, they do not question, and thus implicitly condone, human exceptionalism and the violence it enacts, historically and in this era of the Anthropocene. Therefore, we advocate for the concept of multispecies justice to enrich climate justice in order to more effectively confront the climate crisis. The advantage of reconceptualizing climate justice in this way is that it becomes more inclusive; it acknowledges the differential histories and practices of social, environmental, and ecological harm, while opening just pathways into uncertain futures. A multispecies justice lens expands climate justice by decentering the human and by recognizing the everyday interactions that bind individuals and societies to networks of close and distant others, including other people and more-than-human beings. Such a relational lens provides a vital scientific, practical, material, and ethical road map for navigating the complex responsibilities and politics in the climate crisis. Most importantly, it delineates what genuine flourishing could mean, what systemic transformations may involve (and with whom), how to live with inevitable and possibly intolerable losses, and how to prefigure and enact alternative and just futures. This article is categorized under: Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Climate Change and Global Justice

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据