4.7 Article

Rotatable central composite design versus artificial neural network for modeling biosorption of Cr6+ by the immobilized Pseudomonas alcaliphila NEWG-2

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81348-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on optimizing the biosorption process using immobilized cells to remove Cr6+ ions, comparing the effectiveness of RCCD and ANN models. Experimental results confirmed the significant parameters influencing biosorption and highlighted the role of immobilized bacteria in removing Cr6+ ions, as shown through SEM and EDX analysis.
Heavy metals, including chromium, are associated with developed industrialization and technological processes, causing imbalanced ecosystems and severe health concerns. The current study is of supreme priority because there is no previous work that dealt with the modeling of the optimization of the biosorption process by the immobilized cells. The significant parameters (immobilized bacterial cells, contact time, and initial Cr6+ concentrations), affecting Cr6+ biosorption by immobilized Pseudomonas alcaliphila, was verified, using the Plackett-Burman matrix. For modeling the maximization of Cr6+ biosorption, a comparative approach was created between rotatable central composite design (RCCD) and artificial neural network (ANN) to choose the most fitted model that accurately predicts Cr6+ removal percent by immobilized cells. Experimental data of RCCD was employed to train a feed-forward multilayered perceptron ANN algorithm. The predictive competence of the ANN model was more precise than RCCD when forecasting the best appropriate wastewater treatment. After the biosorption, a new shiny large particle on the bead surface was noticed by the scanning electron microscopy, and an additional peak of Cr6+ was appeared by the energy dispersive X-ray analysis, confirming the role of the immobilized bacteria in the biosorption of Cr6+ ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据