4.7 Article

Spatial memory deficiency early in 6xTg Alzheimer's disease mouse model

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79344-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel 6xTg-AD mouse model, developed by crossing 5xFAD mice with mice expressing mutant tau protein, exhibits faster onset of AD-related pathologies compared to their parental models, showing promise as an advanced tool for studying AD and developing therapeutic interventions.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is mainly characterized by the deposition of extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). While the recent 5xFAD AD mouse model exhibits many AD-related phenotypes and a relatively early and aggressive amyloid beta production, it does not show NFTs. Here, we developed and evaluated a novel AD mouse model (6xTg-AD, 6xTg) by crossbreeding 5xFAD mice with mice expressing mutant (P301L) tau protein (MAPT). Through behavioral and histopathological tests, we analyzed cognitive changes and neuropathology in 6xTg mice compared to their respective parental strains according to age. Spatial memory deficits occurred in 6xTg mice at 2 months of age, earlier than they occurred in 5xFAD mice. Histopathological data revealed aggressive A beta 42 and p-tau accumulation in 6xTg mice. Microglial activation occurred in the cortex and hippocampus of 6xTg mice beginning at 2 months. In 6xTg model mice, the synaptic loss was observed in the cortex from 4 months of age and in the hippocampus from 6 months of age, and neuronal loss appeared in the cortex from 4 months of age and in the hippocampus 6 months of age, earlier than it is observed in the 5xFAD and JNPL3 models. These results showed that each pathological symptom appeared much faster than in their parental animal models. In conclusion, these novel 6xTg-AD mice might be an advanced animal model for studying AD, representing a promising approach to developing effective therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据