4.7 Article

Improving sewage sludge compost process and quality by carbon sources addition

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79443-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708187, 51878216]
  2. Pre-research Project of Heilongjiang Sciences Academy [YY2020SW01]
  3. Outstanding Youth Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Sciences Academy [CXJQ2018SW01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the effects of carbon sources on compost process and quality in lab-scale sewage sludge composting. Results showed that adding readily degradable carbon sources could promote organic matter degradation, improve nitrogen conversion, and accelerate compost maturation. Glucose and sucrose addition resulted in increased dissolved organic carbon, CO2 emission, dehydrogenase activity, nitrification, and germination index during composting.
In present study, the effects of carbon sources on compost process and quality were evaluated in the lab-scale sewage sludge (SS) composting. The composting experiments were performed for 32 days in 5 L reactors. The results showed that carbon sources could change the nitrogen conversion and improve the compost quality. Especially, the readily degradable carbon source could promote organic matter degradation, improve nitrogen conversion process and accelerate compost maturation. The addition of glucose and sucrose could increase dissolved organic carbon, CO2 emission, dehydrogenase activity, nitrification and germination index during the SS composting. That's because glucose and sucrose could be quickly used by microbes as energy and carbon source substance to increase activity of microbes and ammonia assimilation. What's more, the NH3 emission was reduced by 26.9% and 32.1% in glucose and sucrose treatments, respectively. Therefore, the addition of readily degradable carbon source could reduce NH3 emission and improve compost maturity in the SS composting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据