4.7 Article

Neonatal mice resist Plasmodium yoelii infection until exposed to para-aminobenzoic acid containing diet after weaning

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79703-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Food and Drug Administration (Silver Spring, MD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the lack of PABA in maternal milk may provide protection against malaria infection in newborn mice, delaying and reducing the onset of parasitemia. Mice fed with a PABA-deficient diet after weaning were still able to control parasitemia and developed robust T follicular helper responses, providing protection against a second challenge with Plasmodium yoelii.
We developed a newborn (NB) mouse Plasmodium yoelii NL infection model to study malaria in early age. Surprisingly, the onset of parasitemia in P. yoelii challenged NB mice was delayed compared to adults and coincided with the weaning date when weanlings switched from maternal milk to normal chow diet. Also, compared to adult mice, parasitemia resolved much later (48 days vs 20 days post challenge) and the peak parasitemia was twice as high in weanlings. Concurrently, weanlings' germinal center reaction was delayed and diminished compared to adult mice. Maternal milk is deficient in para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), which is required for de novo folate synthesis by Plasmodium. Suggesting a possible role for the protection afforded by PABA-deficient maternal milk, mice fed with a PABA-deficient diet after the weaning continued to control parasitemia. Despite the reduced parasitemia, these mice developed robust T follicular helper (Tfh) responses and were protected from a second P. yoelii challenge. The NB malaria model provides mechanistic insight into the human infant malaria manifestations where a diet solely based on breast-feeding reduces the incidence of severe malaria in infants. NB mice experiments also support further studies to investigate dietary PABA restriction in the management of severe malaria in infants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据