4.6 Article

Continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in biochar amended contaminated paddy soil: A five-year field experiment

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.007

关键词

Biochar; Cadmium; Lead; Contaminated; Paddy soil; Fourier transform infrared

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501339, 21277115, 41301551]
  2. Jiangsu Province Science Foundation for Youths [BK20140468]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2008BAD95B13-1, 201303095]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analyzing the fractionation of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) could provide key information to identify how-wheat straw biochar (WBC) affects the bioavailability of Cd and Pb in contaminated soils. The fractionations of Cd and Pb were extracted from amended paddy soil according to the approach by European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR). Total Cd and Pb concentrations in contaminated paddy soil were decreased by 7.5-23.3% and 3.7-19.8% with WBC application during five years, respectively. The Cd was distributed primarily in the exchangeable (similar to 50%) and carbonate (>30%) fractions, and Pb was the mainly carbonate-bound fraction (similar to 70%). The exchangeable fractions concentration of Cd and Pb were significantly decreased by 8.0-44.6% and 14.2-50.3% during five years. The residual fractions were increased by 4.0-32.4% (Cd) and 14.9-39.6% (Pb). The percentage of exchangeable Cd fractions decreased by 1.2-6.9%, but the incensements of 1.7-7.2% and 1.3-2.2% were observed in carbonate and residual fractions for Cd. Similarly, the percentage of exchangeable Pb fractions decreased by 0.3-1.6%, though the carbonate and residual fraction were increased by 1.2-2.9% and 1.4-12.2%. The changes of Cd and Pb fractions were mainly due to the abundant functional groups and complex structures in WBC, which could improve soil microstructure and increase soil pH and soil organic matter. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据