4.7 Article

Spatial modeling of biological patterns shows multiscale organization of Arabidopsis thaliana heterochromatin

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79158-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [316965]
  2. LabEx Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS [ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS]
  3. Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS [ANR-17-EUR-0007]
  4. IJPB's Plant Observatory technological platforms
  5. INDEPTH COST Action [CA16212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial organization in biological systems plays a crucial role in determining relative positioning and spatial patterns of components. However, biological variability and the lack of appropriate statistical methods hinder the analysis of these interactions.
The spatial organization in the cell nucleus is tightly linked to genome functions such as gene regulation. Similarly, specific spatial arrangements of biological components such as macromolecular complexes, organelles and cells are involved in many biological functions. Spatial interactions among elementary components of biological systems define their relative positioning and are key determinants of spatial patterns. However, biological variability and the lack of appropriate spatial statistical methods and models limit our current ability to analyze these interactions. Here, we developed a framework to dissect spatial interactions and organization principles by combining unbiased statistical tests, multiple spatial descriptors and new spatial models. We used plant constitutive heterochromatin as a model system to demonstrate the potential of our framework. Our results challenge the common view of a peripheral organization of chromocenters, showing that chromocenters are arranged along both radial and lateral directions in the nuclear space and obey a multiscale organization with scale-dependent antagonistic effects. The proposed generic framework will be useful to identify determinants of spatial organizations and to question their interplay with biological functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据