4.6 Article

Bioconversion and biodynamics of Eisenia foetida in different organic wastes through microbially enriched vermiconversion technologies

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 154-161

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.012

关键词

Vermicomposting; Eisenia foetida; Microorganisms; Organic wastes; Nutrients

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present investigation is an attempt to convert organic wastes like water hyacinth, paddy straw and sawdust to organic manure through vermicomposting by Eisenia foetida together with the help of some beneficial microbes such as Trichoderma viride (cellulolytic), Azotobacter chroococcum (nitrogen fixing), Bacillus polymixa (phosphate solubilizing) and Bacillus firmus (potassium solubilizing). Chemical and biochemical properties of vermicompost prepared from the aforementioned organic wastes were studied. Earthworm biomass, growth performance, and cocoon production were higher in vermicompost prepared from water hyacinth and paddy straw as compared to vermicompost prepared from sawdust. All vermibeds showed significant reduction in pH, organic carbon, cellulose content and C/N ratio and substantial increase in humic acid, total N, available P and exchangeable K. Vermistabilization also increased the microbial population and enzyme activities of all organic wastes. Inoculation of A. chroococcum, B. polymixa and B. firmus alone or in combination with T. viride significantly increased nitrogen, available P and K content. Significant increases in microbial population and enzyme activities in vermicomposts were recorded with inoculation of T. viride either alone or in consortia. The best quality compost was prepared when the substrate was treated with all the four microorganisms together followed by vermicomposting. Results indicated that the combination of earthworms and microorganisms reduced the overall time required for composting besides producing a nutrient-enriched compost product. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据