4.6 Review

Ecosystem restoration and conservation in the arid inland river basins of Northwest China: Problems and strategies

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 629-637

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.107

关键词

Hyperarid; Groundwater dependent ecosystem; Ecosystem restoration; Water conveyance

资金

  1. open fund of the State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2013547712]
  2. NNSF [41571015, 41371049, 41323001]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CBA01806]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0601504]
  5. National Science Foundation for Outstanding Youth [41125002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs) in the lower reaches of arid inland river basins of Northwest China have degraded because of a decrease in water supply caused by excessive socio-economic development in the middle reaches of the river. The degraded GDEs have resulted in serious eco-environmental problems, such as drying of terminal lakes, river channel shifts, declines in riparian forest, desert activation, intensification of desert dust storms, and salinization of secondary soils. These problems have further hindered local and regional efforts at sustainable development. An ecosystem conservation and restoration project was initiated in 2000 in order to deal with the eco-environmental problems. The project has been underway for 15 years, but problems still exist. Using the Heihe River and Tarim River basins as examples, this paper explains the ecological-environmental problems and their causes, describes with the status of ecosystem restoration and conservation, analyzes the problems in the ongoing ecosystem conservation and restoration, and suggests strategies for achieving sustainable ecosystem restoration in the lower reaches of the arid inland river basins of Northwest China. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据