4.7 Article

Cognitive and Neurochemical Changes Following Polyphenol-Enriched Diet in Rats

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13010059

关键词

memory; monoamines; SIRT1; dietary polyphenols; brain health; aging; antioxidant; 5-HT; NA; DA

资金

  1. Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB)Govern Balear [ECT 025 09]
  2. Pont La Caixa-UIB Program [7/2014]
  3. MINECO, Madrid, Spain [SAF2014-55903-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term intake of a diet rich in polyphenols has been shown to improve memory and learning, restore brain neurotransmitters and important proteins levels, and have a positive impact on brain health.
Dietary recommendations are frequently developed based on nutrient deficiency or prevention of disease, but less attention has been paid to the dietary guidelines to promote brain health. Active and healthy aging is a prerequisite for improving quality of life as people age, and evidence is establishing a relationship between diet and brain health. This work studied the effect of a diet based on foods rich in antioxidants, especially polyphenols, in rats, three days a week for 20 months starting at 14 months. Behavioral analysis testing working memory, spatial and episodic memory, as well as brain monoaminergic neurotransmitters involved in these processes but also in general brain health were analyzed. In addition, hippocampal SIRT1 protein which has an important role in regulating normal brain function was evaluated. The results show that long-term intake of polyphenol-enriched diet improves memory and learning, correlating with restoration of brain monoaminergic neurotransmitters and hippocampal SIRT1 levels in aged rats. These results agree with reports revealing a neuroprotective effect of different polyphenolic compounds on age-related brain decline, based on its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties; and demonstrate that consumption of antioxidant-rich foods, a few days a week, gives good long-term results in terms of brain health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据