4.7 Review

Association between Breakfast Skipping and Body Weight-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Longitudinal Studies

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu13010272

关键词

breakfast skipping; overweight; obesity; weight gain; Body Mass Index (BMI) change; systematic review; meta-analysis; observational longitudinal studies

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. Open Access Publication Fund of Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that skipping breakfast may lead to weight gain and the onset of overweight and obesity, based on systematic review and meta-analysis of observational longitudinal studies on the association between breakfast skipping and body weight.
Globally, increasing rates of obesity are one of the most important health issues. The association between breakfast skipping and body weight is contradictory between cross-sectional and interventional studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize this association based on observational longitudinal studies. We included prospective studies on breakfast skipping and overweight/obesity or weight change in adults. The literature was searched until September 2020 in PubMed and Web of Science. Summary risk ratios (RRs) or beta coefficients with a 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively, were estimated in pairwise meta-analyses by applying a random-effects model. In total, nine studies were included in the systematic review and three of them were included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analyses indicated an 11% increased RR for overweight/obesity when breakfast was skipped on >= 3 days per week compared to <= 2 days per week (95% CI: 1.04, 1.19, n = two studies). The meta-analysis on body mass index (BMI) change displayed no difference between breakfast skipping and eating (beta = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.01; n = two studies). This study provides minimal evidence that breakfast skipping might lead to weight gain and the onset of overweight and obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据