4.6 Article

Enhanced Antioxidant Activity of Ursolic Acid by Complexation with Copper (II): Experimental and Theoretical Study

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14020264

关键词

ursolic acid; antioxidant; copper (II) complex; quantum-chemical calculations; spectroscopy

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [WZ/WB-IIS/5/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The copper (II) complex of ursolic acid showed higher antioxidant activity compared to ursolic acid alone. Through coordination analysis and examination of chemical parameters, the antioxidant properties of the complex were studied.
The copper (II) complex of ursolic acid (Cu(II) UA) was synthesized and discussed in terms of its infrared, UV-visible spectra, quantum-chemical calculations at B3LYP/6-31G(d) level and antioxidant capacity. The copper (II) complex was stable in methanolic solution with the molar ratio metal:ligand 1:1. The data obtained by FT-IR confirmed the metal ion coordination through the carboxylate anion. The antioxidant properties of ursolic acid and its complex with Cu were discussed on the basis of energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and values of chemical reactivity parameters. The antiradical properties of ursolic acid and the Cu (II) complex were examined against DPPH center dot and HO center dot radicals, and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) was examined. The Cu(II) complex showed higher antioxidant activity than ursolic acid, i.e., in DPPH center dot assay, the EC50 for UA was 47.0 mM, whereas, for Cu(II), UA EC50 = 19.5 mM; the FRAP value for UA was 20.8 mu MFe2+, and 35.4 mu MFe2+ for Cu(II) UA (compound concentration 3 mM). Although there was no distinct difference in the antioxidant activity against HO center dot between these two chemicals, they were both better HO center dot scavengers than DPPH center dot and showed different kinetics in the reaction with DPPH center dot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据