4.6 Article

Natural Building Materials for Interior Fitting and Refurbishment-What about Indoor Emissions?

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14010234

关键词

bio-based insulation; earthen building materials; volatile organic compounds; semi-volatile organic compounds; formaldehyde; radon

资金

  1. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration [608893]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated emissions from over 30 natural building materials for interior works, finding that the majority of the materials had low emissions and met the AgBB evaluation scheme.
Indoor air quality can be adversely affected by emissions from building materials, consequently having a negative impact on human health and well-being. In this study, more than 30 natural building materials (earth dry boards and plasters, bio-based insulation materials, and boards made of wood, flax, reed, straw, etc.) used for interior works were investigated as to their emissions of (semi-)volatile organic compounds ((S)VOC), formaldehyde, and radon. The study focused on the emissions from complete wall build-ups as they can be used for internal partition walls and the internal insulation of external walls. Test chambers were designed, allowing the compounds to release only from the surface of the material facing indoors under testing parameters that were chosen to simulate model room conditions. The emission test results were evaluated using the AgBB evaluation scheme, a procedure for the health-related evaluation of construction products and currently applied for the approval of specific groups of building materials in Germany. Seventeen out of 19 sample build-ups tested in this study would have passed this scheme since they generally proved to be low-emitting and although the combined emissions of multiple materials were tested, 50% of the measurements could be terminated before half of the total testing time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据