4.4 Article

Photobiomodulation: The Clinical Applications of Low-Level Light Therapy

期刊

AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 723-738

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab025

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LLLT has shown clinical efficacy in skin rejuvenation, acne vulgaris, alopecia, and body contouring, but challenges remain in regulating and standardizing this therapy. The existing body of clinical evidence supports the effectiveness of low-energy red/near-infrared light, but methodological flaws and industry funding require improvement in evidence quality. The use of light-emitting diode sources and their comparative physiological effects to laser-based systems need further investigation in high-quality, independent clinical trials.
Background: Low-level light therapy (LLLT) is a recent addition to the pantheon of light-based therapeutic interventions. The absorption of red/near-infrared light energy, a process termed photobiomodulation, enhances mitochondrial ATP production, cell signaling, and growth factor synthesis, and attenuates oxidative stress. Photobiomodulation is now highly commercialized with devices marketed directly to the consumer. In the gray area between the commercial and therapeutic sectors, harnessing the clinical potential in reproducible and scientifically measurable ways remains challenging. Objectives: The aim of this article was to summarize the clinical evidence for photobiomodulation and discuss the regulatory framework for this therapy Methods: A reviewof the clinical literature pertaining to the use of LLLT for skin rejuvenation (facial rhytids and dyschromias), acne vulgaris, wound healing, body contouring, and androgenic alopecia was performed. Results: A reasonable body of clinical trial evidence exists to support the role of low-energy red/near-infrared light as a safe and effective method of skin rejuvenation, treatment of acne vulgaris and alopecia, and, especially, body contouring. Methodologic flaws, small patient cohorts, and industry funding mean there is ample scope to improve the quality of evidence. It remains unclear if light-emitting diode sources induce physiologic effects of compararable nature and magnitude to those of the laser-based systems used in most of the higher-quality studies. Conclusions: LLLT is here to stay. However, its ubiquity and commercial success have outpaced empirical approaches on which solid clinical evidence is established. Thus, the challenge is to prove its therapeutic utility in retrospect. Welldesigned, adequately powered, independent clinical trials will help us answer some of the unresolved questions and enable the potential of this therapy to be realized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据