4.8 Article

A Low-Temperature Additive-Involved Leaching Method for Highly Efficient Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202002754

关键词

additive leaching; inorganic perovskites; ion exchange; low temperature; stability

资金

  1. Young Taishan Scholars [tsqn201812110]
  2. National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars [51822209]
  3. Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, CAS [DICPQIBEBT UN201705]
  4. DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS [DNL180311]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51902324]
  6. Major Program of Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018ZB0316]
  7. Qingdao Key Lab of Solar Energy Utilization & Energy Storage Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inorganic CsPbI3 perovskite can be fabricated at a lower temperature using an additive-involved leaching method, resulting in high crystallinity films with superior stability. The prepared films exhibit a power conversion efficiency of over 16% and maintain over 93% of the initial efficiency after aging for 30 days.
Inorganic CsPbI3 perovskite with an optical bandgap ranging from 1.67 to 1.75 eV is a promising light-harvesting material as a top cell in tandem solar cells, but its high fabrication temperature can damage the middle layers or the bottom subcells. Here, an additive-involved leaching method to fabricate CsPbI3 perovskite films is demonstrated, which can decrease the preparation temperature to 100 degrees C. The CsPbI3 perovskite films with high crystallinity are achieved by a solution assisted reaction between DMAPbI(3) and Cs4PbI6 with the leaching of DMA(+), Cs+, and I-. The as-prepared CsPbI3 perovskite films exhibit much superior stability compared to their high-temperature counterparts. As a result, a power conversion efficiency of over 16% is obtained, and the unencapsulated device maintains over 93% of the initial efficiency after aging for 30 days in air with a relative humidity of 10%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据