期刊
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -出版社
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3424672
关键词
Knowledge graphs; link prediction; knowledge graph embeddings; comparative analysis
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are widely used in industrial and academic settings, with research efforts focused on large-scale information extraction. Link Prediction (LP) techniques address the issue of incompleteness in KGs by identifying missing facts. LP methods based on KG embeddings have shown promising performance, but there is insufficient attention on design choices and the standard practice of reporting accuracy may lead to overlooking majority of KG content.
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have found many applications in industrial and in academic settings, which in turn, have motivated considerable research efforts towards large-scale information extraction from a variety of sources. Despite such efforts, it is well known that even the largest KGs suffer from incompleteness; Link Prediction (LP) techniques address this issue by identifying missing facts among entities already in the KG. Among the recent LP techniques, those based on KG embeddings have achieved very promising performance in some benchmarks. Despite the fast-growing literature on the subject, insufficient attention has been paid to the effect of the design choices in those methods. Moreover, the standard practice in this area is to report accuracy by aggregating over a large number of test facts in which some entities are vastly more represented than others; this allows LP methods to exhibit good results by just attending to structural properties that include such entities, while ignoring the remaining majority of the KG. This analysis provides a comprehensive comparison of embedding-based LP methods, extending the dimensions of analysis beyond what is commonly available in the literature. We experimentally compare the effectiveness and efficiency of 18 state-of-the-art methods, consider a rule-based baseline, and report detailed analysis over the most popular benchmarks in the literature.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据