4.8 Article

Modelling the global burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis avertable by a post-exposure vaccine

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20731-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1190803]
  2. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/R015600/1]
  3. UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), under the MRC/FCDO Concordat agreement [MR/R015600/1]
  4. European Union
  5. MRC [MR/R015600/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1190803] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research suggests that a future TB vaccine could have a significant impact on global rifampicin-resistant TB burden, particularly in countries like India, China, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Russian Federation. When combined with improvements in diagnosis and treatment of drug-resistant TB, the implementation of the vaccine may prove to be effective.
There have been notable advances in the development of vaccines against active tuberculosis (TB) disease for adults and adolescents. Using mathematical models, we seek to estimate the potential impact of a post-exposure TB vaccine, having 50% efficacy in reducing active disease, on global rifampicin-resistant (RR-) TB burden. In 30 countries that together accounted for 90% of global RR-TB incidence in 2018, a future TB vaccine could avert 10% (95% credible interval: 9.7-11%) of RR-TB cases and 7.3% (6.6-8.1%) of deaths over 2020-2035, with India, China, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Russian Federation having the greatest contribution. This impact would increase to 14% (12-16%) and 31% (29-33%) respectively, when combined with improvements in RR-TB diagnosis and treatment relative to a scenario of no vaccine and no such improvements. A future TB vaccine could have important implications for the global control of RR-TB, especially if implemented alongside enhancements in management of drug resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据