4.8 Article

Around one third of current Arctic Ocean primary production sustained by rivers and coastal erosion

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20470-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [643052, 641816, 776810, 821003]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-18-ERC2-0001-01]
  3. MTES/FRB Acidoscope project
  4. ENS-Chanel research chair
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-ERC2-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research indicates that carbon and nutrients from land play a significant role in Arctic Ocean ecosystems and NPP, contributing to the evolution of Arctic Ocean NPP in the future.
Net primary production (NPP) is the foundation of the oceans' ecosystems and the fisheries they support. In the Arctic Ocean, NPP is controlled by a complex interplay of light and nutrients supplied by upwelling as well as lateral inflows from adjacent oceans and land. But so far, the role of the input from land by rivers and coastal erosion has not been given much attention. Here, by upscaling observations from the six largest rivers and using measured coastal erosion rates, we construct a pan-Arctic, spatio-temporally resolved estimate of the land input of carbon and nutrients to the Arctic Ocean. Using an ocean-biogeochemical model, we estimate that this input fuels 28-51% of the current annual Arctic Ocean NPP. This strong enhancement of NPP is a consequence of efficient recycling of the land-derived nutrients on the vast Arctic shelves. Our results thus suggest that nutrient input from the land is a key process that will affect the future evolution of Arctic Ocean NPP. The Arctic Ocean is influenced by carbon and nutrients from rivers and erosion, but how this affects phytoplankton productivity is not understood. Here, the authors use a spatio-temporally resolved biogeochemical model to estimate that the input of carbon and nutrients fuels 28-51% of annual Arctic Ocean productivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据