4.8 Article

Selective capture of carbon dioxide from hydrocarbons using a metal-organic framework

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20489-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. MacDiarmid Institute
  2. RSNZ Marsden Fund [14-MAU-024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers present a metal-organic framework adsorbent, MUF-16, that efficiently captures CO2 over other competing gases with high selectivity. This adsorbent enables high-purity gas separation under dynamic conditions, making it suitable for the purification of natural gas and industrial feedstocks.
Efficient and sustainable methods for carbon dioxide capture are highly sought after. Mature technologies involve chemical reactions that absorb CO2, but they have many drawbacks. Energy-efficient alternatives may be realised by porous physisorbents with void spaces that are complementary in size and electrostatic potential to molecular CO2. Here, we present a robust, recyclable and inexpensive adsorbent termed MUF-16. This metal-organic framework captures CO2 with a high affinity in its one-dimensional channels, as determined by adsorption isotherms, X-ray crystallography and density-functional theory calculations. Its low affinity for other competing gases delivers high selectivity for the adsorption of CO2 over methane, acetylene, ethylene, ethane, propylene and propane. For equimolar mixtures of CO2/CH4 and CO2/C2H2, the selectivity is 6690 and 510, respectively. Breakthrough gas separations under dynamic conditions benefit from short time lags in the elution of the weakly-adsorbed component to deliver high-purity hydrocarbon products, including pure methane and acetylene. Metal-organic framework adsorbents are promising materials for gas separation and purification. Herein, the authors present a metal-organic framework that selectively captures CO2 over small hydrocarbons; this separation is relevant for the purification of natural gas and industrial feedstocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据