4.8 Article

2D atomic crystal molecular superlattices by soft plasma intercalation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19766-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation [62074070, 11704159, 11574215]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20170167, BK20190576]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [JUSRP51726B]
  4. 111 Project [B12018]
  5. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_1860]
  6. Australian Research Council (ARC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) atomic crystal superlattices integrate diverse 2D layered materials enabling adjustable electronic and optical properties. However, tunability of the interlayer gap and interactions remain challenging. Here we report a solution based on soft oxygen plasma intercalation. 2D atomic crystal molecular superlattices (ACMSs) are produced by intercalating O-2(+) ions into the interlayer space using the plasma electric field. Stable molecular oxygen layer is formed by van der Waals interactions with adjacent transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) monolayers. The resulting interlayer gap expansion can effectively isolate TMD monolayers and impart exotic properties to homo-(MoS2[O-2](x)) and hetero-(MoS2[O-2](x)/WS2[O-2](x)) stacked ACMSs beyond typical capacities of monolayer TMDs, such as 100 times stronger photoluminescence and 100 times higher photocurrent. Our potentially universal approach to tune interlayer stacking and interactions in 2D ACMSs may lead to exotic superlattice properties intrinsic to monolayer materials such as direct bandgap pursued for future optoelectronics. Two-dimensional (2D) atomic crystal superlattices offer technological opportunities beyond the reach of existing materials. Here, the authors produce 2D atomic crystal molecular superlattices by intercalating O-2 molecules into the interlayer space of 2D materials using a soft plasma strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据