4.8 Article

3D projection electrophoresis for single-cell immunoblotting

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19738-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Cancer Moonshot award [1R33CA225296-01]
  2. Chan Zuckerberg Biohub
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NSF GRFP)
  5. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunoassays and mass spectrometry are powerful single-cell protein analysis tools; however, interfacing and throughput bottlenecks remain. Here, we introduce three-dimensional single-cell immunoblots to detect both cytosolic and nuclear proteins. The 3D microfluidic device is a photoactive polyacrylamide gel with a microwell array-patterned face (xy) for cell isolation and lysis. Single-cell lysate in each microwell is electrophoretically projected into the 3(rd) dimension (z-axis), separated by size, and photo-captured in the gel for immunoprobing and confocal/light-sheet imaging. Design and analysis are informed by the physics of 3D diffusion. Electrophoresis throughput is>2.5 cells/s (70x faster than published serial sampling), with 25 immunoblots/mm(2) device area (>10x increase over previous immunoblots). The 3D microdevice design synchronizes analyses of hundreds of cells, compared to status quo serial analyses that impart hours-long delay between the first and last cells. Here, we introduce projection electrophoresis to augment the heavily genomic and transcriptomic single-cell atlases with protein-level profiling. Single-cell immunoblotting previously separated proteins on a polyacrylamide slab in the xy direction and was limited by throughput and sample consumption. Here the authors adapt the system to separate proteins in the z direction, allowing for closer spacing of sample wells and improved sample consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据