4.1 Review

Developments in mycotoxin analysis: an update for 2019-2020

期刊

WORLD MYCOTOXIN JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 3-26

出版社

WAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3920/WMJ2020.2664

关键词

sampling; multi-mycotoxin analysis; quality control; multiplex; biosensor; chromatography; mass spectrometry; aptamer; ELISA; molecularly imprinted polymer; high resolution mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [8E18B045]
  2. METROFOOD-CZ research infrastructure project (MEYS Grant) [LM2018100]
  3. [OPPC CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21537]
  4. [CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24503]
  5. [NPU I LO1601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent developments in the analysis of mycotoxins in various matrices from mid-2019 to mid-2020, covering aspects from sampling and quality control to detection and quantitation technologies. The discussion mainly focuses on the significant advances in different technologies such as high resolution mass spectrometry, tandem mass spectrometry, and biosensors.
This review summarises developments on the analysis of various matrices for mycotoxins published in the period from mid-2019 to mid-2020. Notable developments in all aspects of mycotoxin analysis, from sampling and quality assurance/quality control of analytical results, to the various detection and quantitation technologies ranging from single mycotoxin biosensors to comprehensive instrumental methods are presented and discussed. Aside from sampling and quality control, discussion of this past year's developments is organised by detection and quantitation technology and covers chromatography with targeted or non-targeted high resolution mass spectrometry, tandem mass spectrometry, detection other than mass spectrometry, biosensors, as well as assays that use alternatives to antibodies. This critical review aims to briefly present the most important recent developments and trends in mycotoxin determination as well as to address limitations of the presented methodologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据