4.4 Article

Heterogeneity of antigenic constellation in human hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.9701

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; histopathologic variability; immunophenotypical heterogeneity; molecular pathology; antigenic mosaicism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver cancer that is difficult to diagnose and often requires multiple microscopic techniques for confirmation. A retrospective study of 42 HCC cases revealed heterogeneity in the antigenic constellation, which can be expressed differently depending on the degree of tumor differentiation.
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the primary liver malignancies responsible for over a million deaths per year worldwide (approximately 10% of all deaths in the adult age range). The diagnosis of HCC can be difficult and often requires the use of more than one microscopic technique. A retrospective study was performed on a study batch of 42 cases that died of HCC due to metastasis or other secondary complications. Tissue samples were taken in order to investigate the tumour antigenic constellation by means of IHC method using a large variety of antibodies. In situ hybridization was also performed for albumin mRNA to assess the albumin expression in some selected cases. Telomerase activity was investigated using IHC method for the hTERT catalytic subunit. A cocktail of hepatic cytokeratins (CK8, 18) combined with Hep Par-1 and associated to albumin proved to be more powerful than albumin alone in differentiating HCC and increased the value of tumour diagnosis. hTERT expression was proportionally reverse to the tumour degree of differentiation, but was independent from the expression of tumour-proliferating indexes. The heterogeneity of the antigenic constellation in hepatocellular carcinoma suggests an antigenic mosaicism, which can be expressed a synchronous or metachronous manner, depending on the tumour degree of differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据