4.4 Article

Nanobiotechnology for agricultural sustainability, and food and environmental safety

期刊

出版社

CODON PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.15586/qas.v13i1.838

关键词

agriculture; sustainability; nanotechnology; food; environmental safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural development is crucial for ensuring safe agricultural produce to meet the food security of a growing world population. The potential of nanotechnology in improving agricultural productivity and environmental safety is being recognized as a promising next-generation technology.
Agricultural development has become a requisite to meet the food security of an increasing world population under changing climate for eliminating poverty and hunger. Recently, scientists recognized that human wellness and healthy life are going to face challenges in the near future because of the vulnerability of agriculture and natural resources. It is due to imbalance and unnecessary use of synthetic agricultural inputs in traditional farming systems. Therefore, improved agricultural technology has to ensure, in traditional farming, safe agricultural produce and bringing down of environmental pollution. Recently, nanotechnology (NT) has been recognized as a promising next-generation technology in the field of agriculture. As an environment-friendly and economically viable tool, the potentiality of nanomaterials (NMs), such as nanosensors, nanopesticides, nanofertilizers, nanocarriers, nanochips, and nano-packaging, has shown great prospect in improving safe agricultural productivity and upholding of environmental safety. Because the use of NMs decreases imbalance and unconscious utilization of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, this minimizes the loss of nutrients and lead to improved agricultural productivity thru the smooth distribution of fertilizers and pesticides, and also improving water and nutrient efficiency. The current review concentrates on the utilization of NT for agricultural sustainability and environmental safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据