4.2 Article

Adherence of the General Public to Self-Protection Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.445

关键词

COVID-19; pandemic; personal protective equipment; self-protection guideline; transmissible diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the adherence and knowledge of the general public in Tehran, Iran, regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The results showed that while there were individuals who did not use PPE correctly, the majority of participants were receptive towards education on preventive measures through public media.
Objective: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is rapidly growing due to a high level of contagiousness. Different measures have been taken to slow the spread of the virus. Appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is one of these key measures. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated adherence of the general public to use of PPE and their knowledge regarding the rationale behind their use. Methods: Two samples were chosen from public places (a subway station and a city store) in Tehran, Iran, one of the countries affected by COVID-19. Individuals were observed for appropriate use of PPE and interviewed regarding their knowledge on some basic self-protection information. Results: Approximately half of the 431 participants did not take any measures to ensure hand hygiene, whereas those who did not use respiratory protection were far fewer. A considerable number of individuals, however, did not use these PPE correctly. On the other hand, there was a gap in the knowledge of the general public regarding different aspects of protective measures. The majority of the participants were receptive toward education on preventive measurements through public media. Conclusion: Education is an important aspect in containing the COVID-19 pandemic, as it directly increases adherence of the general public to protective measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据