4.1 Article

Normal myocardial strain values using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy adults aged 20 to 72years

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/echo.13323

关键词

echocardiography; left ventricular function; myocardial strain; strain; strain rate imaging

资金

  1. Erasmus MC Thorax Foundation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsEvaluation of left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is useful for clinical and research purposes. However, strain measurements depend on the used software. Normative data for QLAB 10 (Philips) are scarce. Additionally, little is known about the influence of anthropometric factors. We aimed to establish normal adult STE-derived strain and strain rate values and to evaluate associations with anthropometrics. MethodsOne hundred fifty-five healthy subjects aged 20 to 72years (28 subjects per decile) were prospectively gathered and examined with electrocardiography and two-dimensional echocardiography. With STE, we assessed peak systolic LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain, and strain rate from the three standard apical views. ResultsWe included 147 healthy subjects (age 44.613.7years, 50% female, GLS -20.8 +/- 2.0%). Men had significantly lower GLS than women (-20.1 +/- 1.8% vs -21.5 +/- 2.0%, P<.001). GLS was significantly lower in subjects with age above 55years (P=.029), higher blood pressure (P<.001), higher body surface area (BSA, P<.001), larger LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (both P<.001), lower LV ejection fraction (P<.001), and some indices of diastolic function. After multivariable regression analysis, the correlation with systolic blood pressure, E-wave, and LV end-systolic volume remained significant. The systolic strain rates of most segments correlated with BSA. ConclusionsOur study resulted in normative LV GLS values assessed with QLAB 10. Male sex, higher BSA, and higher blood pressure negatively influence GLS. Therefore, these factors should be taken into account for strain interpretation in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据