4.5 Article

Peaceful revolution in genome size: polyploidy in the Nabidae (Heteroptera); autosomes and nuclear DNA content doubling

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 193, 期 1, 页码 145-157

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa138

关键词

18S ribosomal DNA; cytogenetics; FISH; flow cytometry; holokinetic chromosome

类别

资金

  1. Grant Agency of Charles University [277815/2015]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [SVV 260434/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed genome size and the position of 18S ribosomal DNA in different species from the family Nabidae, revealing distinct chromosomal characteristics and significant differences in nuclear DNA content among the three genera studied. Notably, the results strongly support the theory of an autosomal polyploidy event in the evolution of the genus Himacerus.
Genome size and the position of 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) were analysed in two Himacerus, eight Nabis and two Prostemma species from the family Nabidae using flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybrization techniques. The karyotypes of Nabis biforinis and Nabis rnaoricus, each with 2n = 16 + XY, and Prostemma aeneicolle, with 2n = 26 + XY, were recorded for the first time. All the species displayed one or two 18S rDNA signals on the X chromosome and up to two signals on the Y chromosome. Several females exhibited two different types of X chromosome breakage, namely within or outside of the 18S rDNA region. Measurements of nuclear DNA content revealed significant differences between all three genera under study. Most notably, the nuclear DNA content of Himacerus species, with 2n = 32/36 + XY (2C = 9-10 pg), was double that of Nabis species, with 2n = 16 + XY (2C = 4-6 pg). Therefore, the previously rejected theory of an autosomal polyploidy event in the evolution of the genus Himacerus is strongly supported by the results of the present study and is now being resurrected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据