4.6 Letter

COVID-19-induced sarcopenia and physical deconditioning may require reassessment of surgical risk for patients with cancer

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02117-x

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Functional deconditioning; Sarcopenia; Frailty; Prehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-term physiological consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection are not well understood, and COVID-19 may lead to chronic illness, sarcopenia, and physical deconditioning, potentially exacerbating frailty in patients. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms behind the deconditioning effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and how this impacts treatment of malignant disease.
Background: The long-term physiological consequences of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) infection are not known. The ability of COVID-19 to cause chronic illness, sarcopenia, and physical deconditioning may be underestimated and go beyond the anticipated respiratory sequelae. Myalgia, lethargy, and anorexia are common symptoms even in mild to moderate cases and have the potential to exacerbate frailty. How this impacts on risk-stratification for patients requiring surgery for time-critical conditions, such as malignancy, requires further urgent investigation. Main body: The deleterious effect of sarcopenia and poor physical capacity are well recognised in cancer surgery. This review commentary highlights current evidence which suggests skeletal muscle as an under recognised cause of COVID-19-related functional deconditioning. The mechanisms behind this are via direct (viral induced myositis, nutritional decline, cytokine-mediated myopathy) and indirect mechanisms (social isolation, inactivity, and psychological consequences). Conclusion: Further mechanistic research is required to explore the processes behind the deconditioning effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and how this impacts on treatment of malignant disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据