4.6 Editorial Material

Screening colonoscopy: The present and the future

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 233-239

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i3.233

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Water-insufflation colonoscopy; Air-insufflation colonoscopy; Adenomatous polyps; Adenoma detection rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of mortality in the United States, with an increasing number of patients diagnosed at advanced stages before the age of 50, requiring earlier screening. Water insufflation colonoscopies have shown promising results in reducing the need for sedation, decreasing discomfort, and increasing visibility of the colonic mucosa, potentially increasing the number of proficient endoscopists in training to serve the aging population.
In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of mortality in men and women. We are now seeing an increasing number of patients with advanced-stage diagnosis and mortality from colorectal cancer before 50 years of age, which requires earlier screening. With the increasing need for CRC screening through colonoscopy, and thus endoscopists, easier and simpler techniques are needed to train proficient endoscopists. The most widely used approach by endoscopists is air insufflation colonoscopy, where air distends the colon to allow visualization of the colonic mucosa. This technique is un-comfortable for patients and requires an anesthetist to administer sedation. In addition, patients commonly complain about discomfort post-op as air escapes into the small bowel and cannot be adequately removed. Current research into the use of water insufflation colonoscopies has proved promising in reducing the need for sedation, decreasing discomfort, and increasing the visibility of the colonic mucosa. Future direction into water insufflation colonoscopies which have shown to be simpler and easier to teach may increase the number of proficient endoscopists in training to serve our aging population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据