4.5 Article

Cooperative beamforming based artificial noise in uplink wiretap channels

期刊

WIRELESS NETWORKS
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 1861-1874

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-021-02544-y

关键词

Artificial noise; Cooperative beamforming; MIMO channels; Physical layer security; Secrecy capacity; Uplink wiretap channel

资金

  1. Wonkwang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a cooperative beamforming based artificial noise-aided secure transmission for uplink wiretap channels, analyzing the cooperative artificial noise and SINR at the eavesdropper in terms of system and design parameters. The optimal secrecy capacity with and without eavesdropper's CSI is examined, demonstrating near-optimal secrecy capacity as the number of users increases.
We propose a cooperative beamforming based artificial noise-aided secure transmission in uplink wiretap channels, where a single user transmits its own data to base station and the others transmits artificial noise to improve the physical layer security. In this study, the cooperative artificial noise and signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) at the eavesdropper (EV) are analyzed in terms of system (i.e., the total number of users, number of antennas at the base station, and number of antennas at the EV) and design parameters (i.e., the number of beams for generating artificial noise in each user group and the number of user groups). Based on this analysis, the design parameters for uplink secure transmission can be determined to minimize SINR at the EV. Furthermore, the optimal secrecy capacity with EV's channel state information (CSI) is analyzed along with the secrecy capacity without EV's CSI, including the secrecy performance gap between them. Throughout the simulation and numerical results, the analyzed results including asymptotic performance are verified. In addition, it is demonstrated that cooperative artificial noise-aided secure transmission achieves near-optimal secrecy capacity without any CSI on the EV as the number of users increases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据