4.6 Article

Large eddy simulations of wind turbine wakes in typical complex topographies

期刊

WIND ENERGY
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 857-886

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/we.2606

关键词

complex terrain; interaction; LES; wind turbine wake

资金

  1. Project of Innovation-driven Plan in Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2017KFYXJJ141]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51978307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a need to clarify the coupling characteristics of terrain-induced wind fields and wind turbine-induced wake in wind farm micrositing, but research on the effect of hill shape is lacking. Optimal layout of turbines over topographies requires fast prediction of flow behind the turbines. Two superposition methods for predicting turbine wake flow over topographies are compared, with results showing better performance using the B-line method.
There is a need to clarify the coupling characteristics of terrain-induced wind fields and wind turbine-induced wake in wind farm micrositing. However, research investigating the effect of hill shape on this interaction is lacking. In addition, during the optimization of the layout of the turbines over topographies, the flow behind the turbines should be predicted in a fast way. After obtaining the wake flow of the turbine mounted on flat terrain and the flow over the topographies, there are mainly two superposition methods to predict the turbine wake flow over the topographies. One is to add the wind deficit following the location with a vertical distance of the hub height (D-line). The other is to add the wind deficit following the streamline starting from the turbine center (B-line). It remains unknown to what extent these two superposition methods can be adopted. Therefore, the effects of hill shape, wind turbine size, and turbine location are investigated. When the wind deficit, obtained from modeling the wake flow of the turbine mounted on flat terrain, is superposed following B-line, the results are overall better than those when following D-line.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据