4.7 Article

Tree Rings and Observations Suggest No Stable Cycles in Sierra Nevada Cool-Season Precipitation

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020WR028599

关键词

california; drought; paleoclimate; precipitation; sierra nevada; spectra

资金

  1. NSF [AGS-1703029, AGS-1803995]
  2. NASA [16-MAP16-0081]
  3. NOAA MAPP [NA19OAR4310278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

California’s water resources heavily rely on cool-season precipitation in the Sierra Nevada; long-term significant cyclicity in cool-season precipitation indicates potential as seasonal forecasting tools; research suggests that interannual variability of Sierra Nevada cool-season precipitation is not a purely white noise process and aims to diagnose the dynamical drivers of extended periods of cyclicity.
California's water resources rely heavily on cool-season (November-March) precipitation in the Sierra Nevada. Interannual variability is highly volatile and seasonal forecasting has little to no skill, making water management particularly challenging. Over 1902-2020, Sierra Nevada cool-season precipitation totals exhibited significant 2.2- and 13-15-year cycles, accounting for approximately 40% of total variability and perhaps signifying potential as seasonal forecasting tools. However, the underlying climate dynamics are not well understood and it is unclear whether these cycles are stable over the long term. We use tree rings to reconstruct Sierra Nevada cool-season precipitation back to 1400. The reconstruction is skillful, accounting for 55%-74% of observed variability and capturing the 20th-century 2.2- and 13-15-year cycles. Prior to 1900, the reconstruction indicates no other century-long periods of significant spectral power in the 2.2- or 13-15-year bands. The reconstruction does indicate significant cyclicity over other extended periods of several decades or longer, however, with dominant periodicities in the ranges of 2.1-2.7 and 3.5-8 years. The late 1700s through 1800s exhibited the highest-amplitude cycles in the reconstruction, with periodicities of 2.4 and 5.7-7.4 years. The reconstruction should serve to caution against extrapolating the observed 2.2- and 13-15-year cycles to guide future expectations. On the other hand, observations and the reconstruction suggest that interannual variability of Sierra Nevada cool-season precipitation is not a purely white noise process and research should aim to diagnose the dynamical drivers of extended periods of cyclicity in this critical natural resource.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据