4.5 Article

Relative Differences between Nonlinear and Equivalent-Linear 1-D Site Response Analyses

期刊

EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 1845-1865

出版社

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH INST
DOI: 10.1193/051215EQS068M

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) as part of NGA-East
  2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  4. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
  5. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the conditions for which one-dimensional (1-D) nonlinear (NL) site response analysis results are distinct from equivalent-linear (EL) results and provides guidance for predicting when differences are large enough to be of practical significance. Relative differences in spectral accelerations and Fourier amplitudes computed from NL and EL analyses are assessed for a range of site conditions and for suites of input motions appropriate for active crustal and stable continental regions. Among several considered parameters, EL/NL differences are most clearly dependent on shear strain index (I-gamma), defined as the ratio of input motion peak velocity to time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of the soil profile. For small I-gamma (generally under 0.03%), EL and NL results are practically identical, whereas at larger strains, differences can be significant for frequencies >0.3 Hz. Frequency-dependent I-gamma, values are recommended for conditions above which NL analyses are preferred to EL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据