4.6 Article

Removal of a Textile Azo-Dye (Basic Red 46) in Water by Efficient Adsorption on a Natural Clay

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 232, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-020-04968-2

关键词

Basic red 46; Azo-dye; Wastewater; Bentonite; Textile dye removal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient removal of cationic textile dye was achieved using natural bentonite as adsorbent under mild conditions, demonstrating excellent performance with fast and high removal efficiency.
Removal of textile azo-dyes from industrial wastewater is a concerning problem in the modern societies. Adsorption of organic dyes is an alternative for removing these pollutants, but efficient and low-cost adsorbents are required. In this work, a natural (crude) bentonite was used as adsorbent to remove a model cationic (basic) textile dye (basic red 46). Some parameters such as initial dye concentration, time, pH, and temperature were studied in semi-batch experiments to obtain the best conditions for adsorption of basic red 46 (BR-46) with minimal quantity of adsorbent (10 mg in 100 mL of solution). An experimental adsorption capacity (q(m)) of 594 mg g(-1) was determined directly from the adsorption curve for 60 mg L-1, pH=7 and 25 degrees C. The thermodynamic parameters Delta G degrees, Delta H degrees and Delta S degrees were also estimated. Several adsorption isotherms (Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin) and kinetic models (pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, and intra-particle diffusion) were applied to the experimental data; thus, the best settings were obtained by Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second order kinetic model. The comparison of results obtained for this natural bentonite with respect to some materials published in the literature reveals the excellent performance of this material for adsorption of BR-46, allowing a fast and higher removal (94% 4, at 10 min), under mild conditions (neutral pH, 25 degrees C and atmospheric pressure). Graphical Abstract

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据