4.7 Article

Source-to-sink sedimentary systems and global carbon burial: A river runs through it

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 30-42

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.011

关键词

Source to sink; Organic carbon; Carbon cycle

资金

  1. NSF S2S project [OCE-0646159]
  2. NSF GeoPrisms program [1144483]
  3. Critical Zone Observatory for Intensively Managed Landscapes (IML-CZO) [EAR-1331906]
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1144483] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Source to sink sedimentary systems are important settings of carbon cycling, serving as sites of carbon transfer between terrestrial and marine reservoirs, and as the primary locations for organic carbon burial on Earth. The age and character of the carbon that is buried at the terminal ends of these systems reflects the sources and transformations of the organic carbon (OC) throughout their linked terrestrial and marine segments. Profound differences are observed between large passive and small active margin systems. Large passive margin systems are characterized by large floodplains and relatively broad shelves where OC has protracted exposure to oxidants. Rapid burial in prograding, subaqueous deltaic clinoforms or bypass to submarine fans, however, leads to high burial efficiency of terrestrial biospheric OC in some passive margin settings. The OC in small active margin systems, in contrast, follows relatively short pathways from headwaters to seabed. This rapid transit, facilitated by the important role of storm-driven transport in such settings, can lead to high OC burial efficiencies. The study of OC sources and transformations in contemporaneous source to sink sedimentary systems informs interpretations about the systems in which OC was buried in the geologic past, their stratigraphic records of environmental change, and their potential to produce petroleum resources. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据