4.7 Review

Heat as a tracer to quantify processes and properties in the vadose zone: A review

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 358-373

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.009

关键词

Hydrogeology; Hydrogeophysics; Soil moisture; Vadose zone; Heat transport; Heat-as-a-tracer; Thermal regime; Unsaturated subsurface

资金

  1. UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
  2. Gary Johnston Fund
  3. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies (FRQNT) [173538]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil moisture and temperature are some of the most important controls for a wide variety of geochemical and ecological processes in the vadose zone (VZ). Soil moisture is highly variable both spatially and temporally. The development of methods to measure it on various scales has been the subject of much activity. Recently, geoscientists have been increasingly interested in measuring temperature as a proxy for hydrologic properties and parameters, including soil moisture. Here, we discuss the motivation, primary concepts, equipment, and fundamental thermal and hydraulic models related to heat and water transport in variably saturated porous media. A large variety of methods for heat tracing, including both passive and active-heating methodologies, are detailed. Heat tracing methods offer the capacity to measure soil moisture on a scale from similar to 1 cm up to several km using temperature, a parameter whose measurement in VZ studies is often required anyway due to its effect on many subsurface processes. Furthermore, heat-tracing methods are not affected by high salinity pore water that can limit electromagnetic soil moisture methods. We also review coupled thermo-hydro VZ modelling software and VZ thermal regime studies and identify several knowledge gaps. With the intention to serve as an introduction to VZ heat-tracing, this review consolidates recent advances and outlines potential themes for future research. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据