4.7 Review

Magnetic mineral assemblages in gills and paleosols as the basis for paleoprecipitation proxies: A review of magnetic methods and challenges

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 28-48

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.014

关键词

Paleoprecipitation; Proxy; Soil magnetism; Paleosols; Iron oxides; Environmental magnetism

资金

  1. Richard C. Dennis Fellowship through the UMN Department of Earth Sciences
  2. UMN Stanwood Johnston Fellowship
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences [1339505] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic iron oxide minerals, principally magnetite, maghemite, hematite, and goethite are formed in well drained soils in response to a suite of physical, chemical, and biological factors. Despite a wide range of complexity in the pedogenic processes that lead to magnetic mineral formation, dissolution, and transformation, there are well-documented empirical relationships between various magnetic mineral assemblages in soils with environmental and climatic conditions. Recently there has been an increase in the number of quantitative magnetic paleoprecipitation proxies that have been developed, and there is great potential for magnetic methods to be used in the geologic record to develop reconstructions of past climates. Magnetic paleoprecipitation proxies have been widely utilized in Quaternary or younger loess-paleosol systems; however, they have yet to be utilized in the pre-Quaternary fossil record. Future studies of magnetic mineralogy of soils and paleosols should aim to explore non-loessic modern soils and pre-Quaternary paleosols with more focus on understanding the interaction between magnetic mineral assemblages and soil moisture. Applications of existing and novel magnetic paleoprecipitation proxies in the fossil record should prove to be a valuable resource for paleoclimatologists. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据