4.7 Article

The pre-Mesozoic rocks of northern Chile: U-Pb ages, and Hf and O isotopes

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 88-105

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.11.009

关键词

U-Pb; SHRIMP; Geochronology; Zircon; Pre-Andean basement; Provenance

资金

  1. FONDECYT [1095099, 1130227]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supposed pre-Mesozoic igneous and metamorphic rocks from northern Chile are reviewed in the light of twenty-one new SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age determinations. Metamorphic rocks from the precordillera upthrust belt mostly show a wide spectrum of zircon ages, indicating derivation from sedimentary protoliths. Youngest detrital zircon ages (i.e., maximum depositional ages) range from c. 850 Ma at Belen to 1000-1100 Ma in Sierra de Moreno and Cordon de Lila. Late Proterozoic provenance throughout the region corresponds to a c.1 Ga igneous and metamorphic event. The main source region could have been the Proterozoic MARA block or Laurentia to the west. Early Ordovician plutonic rocks (465-485 Ma) correlated with the Famatinian magmatism of NW Argentina are recognised in all three outcrop areas, and contemporaneous volcanic rocks in Cordon de Lila. Hf- and O-isotope data for Ordovician zircon in these rocks, and for c. 1450 detrital zircon in the metasedimentary rocks, are consistent with ultimate derivation from Early Mesoproterozoic to Paleoproterozoic lithosphere. A depositional age younger than 400 Ma is determined for the Quebrada Aroma metamorphic complex, indicating post-Early Silurian metamorphism and folding. Carboniferous igneous and deformational events occur in the Coast Range, where metasedimentary complexes are mostly related to Late Paleozoic subduction-accretion; deformation and metamorphism continued near the present Pacific shore line until Triassic and earliest Jurassic times. The underlying crust of much of Norte Grande is considered to be Proterozoic (Arequipa-Antofalla block or MARA), although there are no igneous rock outcrops of this age. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据