4.6 Review

Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells in Autoimmunity and Inflammatory Diseases

期刊

TRENDS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 59-75

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2020.11.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (AEI/FEDER, UE) [SAF2017-88086-R]
  2. RESTORE project (European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme) [779316]
  3. Spanish projects [PI17/01521, PI20/01313]
  4. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion
  5. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)
  6. Accion Estrategica en Salud [IFI17/00034]
  7. Fondo Social Europeo
  8. INsTRuCT Consortium, focused on developing innovative myeloid regulatory cell (MRC)-based immunotherapies
  9. European Union
  10. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [779316] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendritic cells play a crucial role in activating T cells and can acquire tolerogenic functions through various stimuli. Research shows that tolerogenic dendritic cells have potential clinical applications in treating inflammatory diseases.
Dendritic cells (DCs), the most efficient antigen-presenting cells, are necessary for the effective activation of naive T cells. DCs can also acquire tolerogenic functions in vivo and in vitro in response to various stimuli, including interleukin (IL)-10, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, vitamin D3, corticosteroids, and rapamycin. In this review, we provide a wide perspective on the regulatory mechanisms, including crosstalk with other cell types, downstream signaling pathways, transcription factors, and epigenetics, underlying the acquisition of tolerogenesis by DCs, with a special focus on human studies. Finally, we present clinical assays targeting, or based on, tolerogenic DCs in inflammatory diseases. Our discussion provides a useful resource for better understanding the biology of tolerogenic DCs and their manipulation to improve the immunological fitness of patients with certain inflammatory conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据