4.6 Review

To NMD or Not To NMD: Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Cancer and Other Genetic Diseases

期刊

TRENDS IN GENETICS
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 657-668

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.11.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [757700]
  2. ERC [IR-DC (616434)]
  3. ICREA Research Professor program
  4. Severo Ochoa Centres of Excellence program
  5. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)/Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades-Agencia Estatal de Investigacion [BFU2017-89488-P, BFU2017-89833P]
  6. Bettencourt Schueller Foundation
  7. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca [2017 SGR 1322]
  8. Centres de Recerca de Catalunya (CERCA) program/Generalitat de Catalunya
  9. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness to the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) partnership
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [757700] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway has been extensively studied to accurately predict the degradation of mRNA with premature termination codons (PTCs). NMD plays a crucial role in disease identification and treatment, as well as in cancer immunotherapy.
The nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway degrades some but not all mRNAs bearing premature termination codons (PTCs). Decades of work have elucidated the molecular mechanisms of NMD. More recently, statistical analyses of large genomic datasets have allowed the importance of known and novel 'rules of NMD' to be tested and combined into methods that accurately predict whether PTC-containing mRNAs are degraded or not. We discuss these genomic approaches and how they can be applied to identify diseases and individuals that may benefit from inhibition or activation of NMD. We also discuss the importance of NMD for gene editing and tumor evolution, and how inhibiting NMD may be an effective strategy to increase the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据