4.4 Review

A Short Review of Recent Advances in Direct CO2 Hydrogenation to Alcohols

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 64, 期 5-6, 页码 371-394

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-020-01405-w

关键词

CO2 hydrogenation; Methanol; Higher alcohols; Catalyst design; Structure-performance relations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776296]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0602203]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21090201]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZDRW-ZS-2018-1-3]
  5. Shanghai Sailing Program [19YF1453000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conversion of CO2 with hydrogen into value-added chemicals is a promising approach to addressing global climate change. Current research focuses on the direct hydrogenation of CO2 to produce methanol and higher alcohols, with a need for further advancements in catalyst design and mechanistic investigation.
The continuous increase in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emission resulting in global climate change has been of great concern in the past decades. With the renewable hydrogen resource being more realistic, the transformation of CO2 with hydrogen into value-added chemicals becomes a promising route to address the environment and climate issues. The chemical synthesis of alcohols which serve as chemical building blocks and the hydrogen energy carrier through direct CO2 hydrogenation has attracted more attention and been studied extensively nowadays. There remain major challenges in developing catalysts with high activity, selectivity and stability. In this review, we summarize the state of the art advances and perspectives in direct CO2 hydrogenation to methanol and other higher alcohols. We focus on the catalyst design, mechanistic investigation and the structure-performance relations of two categories of catalysts, noble metal and non-noble metal. Then, we propose an outlook for further catalyst design and study in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据