4.5 Article

Investigation of the mechanical and flame retardant properties of carbon fiber modified phenolic epoxy resin

期刊

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
卷 91, 期 9-10, 页码 1132-1145

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0040517520971361

关键词

phenolic resin; epoxy resin; carbon fiber; flame retardancy; pyrolysis kinetics; mechanical properties

资金

  1. Future Scientists Program of the ``Double First Class'' of China University of Mining and Technology [2019WLKXJ055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By incorporating epoxy resin and carbon fiber, the flame retardancy and mechanical properties of phenolic resin were improved. The addition of epoxy resin had a small impact on flame retardancy, while short carbon fiber significantly enhanced flame retardancy and mechanical properties of phenolic epoxy resin.
Epoxy resin and carbon fiber were used as the reinforcement to modify phenolic resin. Phenolic epoxy resin was prepared by physical blending, and carbon fiber was introduced into the resin matrix, and meanwhile the curing agent was added. The flame retardancy and thermal stability of the samples were evaluated, and the mechanical performance of the samples was characterized to investigate the overall performance. The flame retardancy of phenolic epoxy resin decreased slightly with epoxy resin of 5 wt%. The oxygen index was decreased by 6.3%, the ignition time was shortened by 66 s, and the peak heat release rate was increased by 8.9%. The tensile strength and elastic modulus were increased by 46% and 26.1%, respectively. The flame retardant and mechanical properties of phenolic epoxy resin were improved the most with short carbon fiber of 0.5 wt%. The oxygen index was increased by 4.6%, the ignition time was delayed by 35 s, the peak heat release rate was reduced by 18.9%, the carbon residue rate at 800celcius was increased by 60.4%, the apparent activation energy was increased by 11.3%, and the tensile strength and elastic modulus were improved by 90.4% and 87.9%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据