4.5 Article

Enhanced mechanical performance of biocompatible silk fibroin films through mesoscopic construction of hierarchical structures

期刊

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
卷 91, 期 9-10, 页码 1146-1154

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0040517520975622

关键词

silk fibroin; hierarchical structures; mechanical properties; biodegradable film

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0802802]
  2. NUS AcRF Tier 1 [R144-000-367-114]
  3. 111'' project [B16029]
  4. National Nature Science Foundation of China [U1405226, 51502253, 21503175, 21705135]
  5. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blending polyethylene glycol into silk fibroin solutions can reconstruct the hierarchical micro structure and improve the mechanical performance of the composite film, which is beneficial for cell proliferation and adhesion.
Silk fibroin (SF) material receives a great deal of attention in the biomedical field for its extensive mechanical performance and applications due to its singular structure/properties and applications, especially hierarchical structure. Here, we blended polyethylene glycol (PEG) into SF solutions that reconstruct the hierarchical micro structure of SF. The effect of PEG on the SF gelation process was in situ observed through rheological measurement and optical density changes. The structural change of SF/PEG blended films with different concentrations and their effects on the mechanical performance were investigated. The results indicated that with increasing PEG content, the beta-sheet content of the films increased with the alpha-helix declining, which enables a composite film with a fracture strain exceeding 300%, Young's modulus exceeding 200 MPa and a fracture strength exceeding 20 MPa. The culture of MC-3T3 proves that the film is beneficial for cell proliferation and adhesion. By constructing the mesoscopic structure of SF, the plasticized silk materials provide great options for biodegradable and flexible protein-based materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据