4.1 Article

Goodness of fit for models with intractable likelihood

期刊

TEST
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 713-736

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11749-020-00747-7

关键词

Approximate Bayesian computation; Model adequacy; Model checking; Simulation-based modeling

资金

  1. MINECO-Spain [PID2019-104790GB-I00]
  2. Wellcome Trust fellowship [WR092311MF]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A general and computationally inexpensive Monte Carlo framework for obtaining p-values asymptotically uniformly distributed in [0, 1] is proposed for models with intractable likelihoods. Numerical investigations show favorable power properties in detecting actual model discrepancies compared to other diagnostic approaches. The technique is illustrated on analytically tractable examples and a complex tuberculosis transmission model.
Routine goodness-of-fit analyses of complex models with intractable likelihoods are hampered by a lack of computationally tractable diagnostic measures with well-understood frequency properties, that is, with a known sampling distribution. This frustrates the ability to assess the extremity of the data relative to fitted simulation models in terms of pre-specified test statistics, an essential requirement for model improvement. Given an Approximate Bayesian Computation setting for a posited model with an intractable likelihood for which it is possible to simulate from them, we present a general and computationally inexpensive Monte Carlo framework for obtaining p-valuesthat are asymptotically uniformly distributed in [0, 1] under the posited model when assumptions about the asymptotic equivalence between the conditional statistic and the maximum likelihood estimator hold. The proposed framework follows almost directly from the conditional predictive p-value proposed in the Bayesian literature. Numerical investigations demonstrate favorable power properties in detecting actual model discrepancies relative to other diagnostic approaches. We illustrate the technique on analytically tractable examples and on a complex tuberculosis transmission model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据