4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive microchip electrophoretic detection of the mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) based on isothermal strand-displacement polymerase reaction

期刊

TALANTA
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121686

关键词

Microchip electrophoresis; Isothermal strand-displacement polymerase reaction; MecA gene; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method integrating ISDPR with MCE was developed for rapid and sensitive detection of the mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. The method showed advantages such as label-free detection, ultra-sensitivity, rapid detection, and efficient separation of amplified products.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the main pathogens involved in hospital and com-munity infection. To rapidly and sensitively detect the mecA gene, which is relevant to methicillin-resistant strains, microchip electrophoresis (MCE) integrated with isothermal strand-displacement polymerase reaction (ISDPR) was developed. In the ISDPR signal recycle amplification, the target DNA opened the DNA hairpin structure by specifically binding with the hairpin probe (HP), and then the primer hybridized with the probe and released the target DNA in the presence of Klenow Fragment exo (KF exo) polymerase. The released target DNA hybridized with the next HP and then was displaced by the primer again, consequently achieving target recycling and amplification. The amplified products of the HP-cDNA duplex were separated rapidly from other DNAs by MCE. Under optimal conditions, the limit of detection of the target DNA was as low as 12.3 pM (S/N = 3). The proposed ISDPR with MCE method was also successfully applied to detect methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and the experimental results showed that it had some advantages such as being label free, ultrasensitive, rapid and well separated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据