4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Mechanical and tribological behaviors of hard and tough TaxHf1-xN films with various Ta contents

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126412

关键词

Microstructure; Hardness; Toughness; Wear resistance; Ta-Hf-N film

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51101087]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M540450, 2014T70520]
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_0277]
  4. Fundamental Research Project of Guizhou Science and Technology Department [QKHJC [2019]1085, [2020]1Y230]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guizhou [QKHPTRC [2018]5781-16]
  6. Talent Introduction Research Project of Guizhou University [GURJHZ [2017]01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hardness and toughness of HfN films alloying with Ta element is crucial for their wear resistance when they are applied in the harsh environment. In this study, TaxHf1-xN (x= 0-1) thin films with various Ta contents were deposited on silicon wafer and TC4 alloy substrates by DC reactive magnetron sputtering, respectively. The relationship between structure, mechanical and tribological properties of TaxHf1-xN films was investigated. TaxHf1-xN films are presented as the solid solutions with B1-NaCl rock salt structure. As the content of tantalum increases, the grain size and residual compressive stress of TaxHf1-xN films increases firstly then decreases, while the preferred orientation transfers from (111) to (200) and then back to (111). The hardness and H/E increases initially and then decreases with the Ta contents, which is also consistent with the fracture toughness. When x is 0.58, TaxHf1-xN film shows the maximum hardness value (44 GPa), H/E (0.15), H-3/E-2 (1.02 GPa), fracture toughness (3.48 MPa.m(1/2)) and lower wear rate (5.6x10(-6)mm(3)/Nm). It is found that the wear resistance of TaxHf1-xN films is directly related to the H/E and fracture toughness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据