4.7 Article

Mechanical, tribological and corrosion physiognomies of CNT-Al metal matrix composite (MMC) coatings deposited by cold gas dynamic spray (CGDS) process

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126380

关键词

Carbon nanotube; Polymer pyrolysis chemical vapor deposition; High-energy ball milling; Cold gas dynamic spray; Electro chemical corrosion; Tribology

资金

  1. Changsha Science and Technology Project [kq1801004]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ40045]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 1 wt% carbon nanotube-aluminum (CNT-Al) metal matrix composite (MMC) powder was prepared using a polymer pyrolysis chemical vapor deposition (PP-CVD) coupled high energy ball milling (HEBM) method and the resultant MMC powder was spray deposited as a protective coating on the surface of AZ91 Mg alloy by the cold gas dynamic spray (CGDS) process. The coating microstructure, phase composition, mechanical properties, corrosion, and dry sliding wear (tribological) resistances were compared to the properties of CGDS pure Al coating. The results show that the coatings prepared by CGDS has not undergone any stoichiometric change and CNT as well as Al4C3 phases that were originally present in the CNT-Al feed-stock powder were well preserved in the resultant MMC coatings. In addition, the number and size of the pores in the CNT-Al MMC coating are significantly lower than that of the pure Al coating. The average hardness and elastic modulus of the CNT-Al MMC coating were 1.66 GPa and 77.6 GPa, which were 112.8% and 11.7% higher than those of the pure Al coating, respectively. The corrosion current density and wear rate of the CNT-Al MMC coating were 2.030 x 10(-6) A/cm(2) and 9.34 x 10(-4) mm(3)/N.m respectively, which were one order of magnitude lower compared to the pure Al coating, highlighting the excellent corrosion and wear resistance of CNT-Al MMC coating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据