4.7 Article

Geochemical evidence for cryptic sulfur cycling in salt marsh sediments

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 453, 期 -, 页码 23-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.001

关键词

salt marsh; anaerobic respiration; sulfur oxygen isotopes; sulfate; cryptic sulfur cycling

资金

  1. Marshall Scholarship
  2. ERC Starting Investigator Grant [307582]
  3. NERC [NE/H011595/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H011595/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [307582] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cryptic sulfur cycling is an enigmatic process in which sulfate is reduced to some lower-valence state sulfur species and subsequently quantitatively reoxidized; the rate and microbial energetics of this process and how prevalent it may be in the environment remain controversial. Here we investigate sulfur cycling in salt marsh sediments from Norfolk, England where we observe high ferrous iron concentrations with no depletion of sulfate or change in the sulfur isotope ratio of that sulfate, but a 5%(0) increase in the oxygen isotope ratio in sulfate, indicating that sulfate has been through a reductive cycle replacing its oxygen atoms. This cryptic sulfur cycle was replicated in laboratory incubations using O-18-enriched water, demonstrating that the field results do not solely result from mixing processes in the natural environment. Numerical modeling of the laboratory incubations scaled to represent the salt marsh sediments suggests that the uptake rate of sulfate during this cryptic sulfur cycling is similar to the uptake rate of sulfate during the fastest microbial sulfate reduction that has been measured in the natural environment. The difference is that during cryptic sulfur cycling, all of the sulfur is subsequently reoxidized to sulfate. We discuss mechanisms for this pathway of sulfur cycling including the possible link to the subsurface iron cycle. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据