4.5 Article

The value of structural health monitoring in seismic emergency management of bridges

期刊

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 537-553

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1862251

关键词

Bridges; decision making; seismic hazard management; structural health monitoring; value of information

资金

  1. Italian Civil Protection Department within the ReLUIS Project 'Structural Health Monitoring and Satellite Data' [WP6-2019-21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a methodology to compute the value of structural health monitoring (SHM) for seismic emergency management of roadway bridges. The results show that the SHM information provides maximum support to decision making when the costs of alternative decisions without SHM information are comparable.
The management of civil infrastructures in the aftermath of a seismic event is a concern for decision makers, which have to choose quickly among alternative actions with limited knowledge on the actual structural conditions. The availability of real time Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) data on the asset might be particularly useful. However, SHM data are not collected for free, and the cost of the SHM system should be compared with its associated benefit. A powerful tool to estimate such benefit is the Value of Information (VoI) from Bayesian decision theory. This paper provides a methodology to compute the VoI of SHM for seismic emergency management of roadway bridges. This methodology can be used by decision makers before the installation of a seismic SHM system to quantify the cost benefit of doing so and thus optimize the allocation of economic resources. Results show that the VoI is high when the expected costs of the decision alternatives (such as 'keep the bridge open' or 'close the bridge') evaluated without the SHM information are comparable. In this condition, which is highly dependent on the seismic hazard and on emergency management costs at stake, the SHM information provides the maximum support to decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据