4.5 Article

Framework for estimating the risk and resilience of road networks with bridges and embankments under both seismic and tsunami hazards

期刊

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 494-514

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1843503

关键词

Bridges; embankments; fragility curves; resilience; risk; road networks; seismic hazard; tsunami hazard

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16KK0152, 19H00813]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H00813, 16KK0152] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper establishes a framework for assessing road networks under seismic and tsunami hazards, quantifying risk and resilience while considering uncertainties and discussing retrofitting priorities.
To develop disaster mitigation measures in coastal regions affected by earthquakes, it is important to consider the effects of both seismic and tsunami hazards on road structures and assess the social impacts associated with the economic loss and reduction in network functionality. In this paper, a risk- and resilience-based assessment framework is established for road networks under both seismic and tsunami hazards. In the proposed methodology, the risk and resilience are quantified by the economic loss and postdisaster functionality of road networks, respectively. Uncertainties associated with estimations of fault movement, hazard intensity and structural vulnerability are considered when estimating the failure probability using Monte Carlo simulation. Moreover, structural vulnerability against tsunamis is estimated considering the effects of ground motion-induced damage on the reduction in tsunami capacity. As an illustrative example, the road networks in two Japanese cities expected to be affected by the anticipated Nankai Trough earthquake, which would cause strong ground motions and a subsequent tsunami, are analyzed. Finally, the retrofitting prioritization for various structures is discussed based on the risk and resilience quantified as performance indicators for social impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据